Site work and paving for a road / highway in Byers, Colorado. Completed plans call for site work for a road / highway; and for paving for a road / highway.

The Heritage Todd Creek Metropolitan District (District) is seeking Contractors or Joint Ventures (JV) capable of Pavement and concrete repairs; crack sealing; pavement removal and replacement; concrete curb and sidewalk removal and replacement, striping, and any other elements related to paving and concrete repairs. The work shall commence on or about June 15th, 2023. All Bidders must submit a Pre-Qualification statement at or before the time of Bid. Contractor Pre-Qualifications Statements: Interested Contractors may be considered for Pre-qualification by electronically submitting a copy of: 1. AIA Form A-305 Pre-Qualification Statement or equivalent information. 5/12/23, 10:16 AM JustPaste.it - paste text and share with your friends. Submissions will be submitted via email to Brandon Collins and Cody Conry. Faxed submissions will not be accepted. Late submission may not be accepted. Questions regarding the submission of qualifications should be directed as provided below. All questions concerning this bid shall be directed via email to: Brandon Collins, P.E. Independent District Engineering Services, LLC Heritage Todd Creek Metropolitan District Engineer 1626 Cole Boulevard, Suite 125 Lakewood, CO 80401 E-mail: bcollins@idesllc.com Cody Conry Independent District Engineering Services, LLC. Project Engineer 1626 Cole Boulevard, Suite 125 Lakewood, CO 80401 E-mail: cconry@idesllc.com Owner s Right to Reject: The Owner reserves the right to select a limited number of Contractors/JV submitting Pre-Qualification Statements. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all Contractor/JV Pre-Qualifications Statements and to waive all irregularities therein, and all Contractors/JV submitting Pre-Qualifications (Proposed Bidders) shall agree that all such rejection shall be without liability on the part of the Owner for any damage or claim brought by any Proposed Bidder because of such rejection, nor shall the Proposed Bidder seek any recourse of any kind against the Owner or his representative because of such rejection. The filing of any Pre-Qualification Statement in response to this invitation shall constitute an agreement of the Proposed Bidder to these conditions. Legal Notice No. NTS2561 First Publication: May 11, 2023 Last Publication: May 11, 2023 Publisher: The Northglenn-Thornton Sentinel Misc. Private Legals Public Notice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the 5/12/23, 10:16 AM JustPaste.it - paste text and share with your friends A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P.12 (a)(2) or (3) you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff s attorney,whose name and address are: Steven L. Theesfeld YOST & BAILL, LLP Attorney for Plaintiff 220 S. 6th Street, Suite 2050 Minneapolis, MN 55402. If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. That Crewmax breached certain statutory, express, and implied warranties which covered the roofing services performed at the residence. 18. That Crewmax, specifically, issued a 10-year workmanship warranty to Pak where it guaranteed that installation would meet or exceed manufacturer s specifications and that work would be completed to industry standard or beyond. 19. That as a direct and proximate result of Crewmax s breach of warranties as described above, Plaintiff s insured suffered damages in an amount in excess of $75,000.00. COUNT III BREACH OF CONTRACT 20. Each of the above allegations is incorporated by reference as if stated herein. 21. Crewmax entered into a contract with Pak, whereby Crewmax agreed to perform roof work at the building in a workmanlike manner and free from defects. 22. Crewmax breached its contract with Pak when it failed to do the roof work in a workmanlike manner free from defects. 23. That as a direct and proximate result of Crewmax s breach of contract as described above, Plaintiff s insured suffered damages in an amount in excess of $75,000.00. 24. As a result of the aforesaid payments, Depositors is subrogated by law and contract to all rights, claims, and causes of action of Pak against Crewmax. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Depositors Insurance Company a/s/o Pak Hospitality prays for judgment against Defendant Crewmax, LLC in an amount in excess of $75,000 with prejudgment interest thereon, their costs and disbursements herein, and for such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.