Site work, new construction, remodeling and renovation of a mixed-use development in Dallas, Oregon. Design plans call for the construction of a educational facility; for the remodel of a educational facility; for the renovation of a educational facility; and for site work for a educational facility.

Dallas School District First Addendum to Dallas School District Construction Project Management Request for Proposals This Is an Addendum to the Dallas School District's Construction Project Management. Except as Changed by This Addendum, All Terms, Conditions, Scope of Work, Plans, Specification, Requirements and Deadlines in the Original Rfp and Previous Addenda Remain Unchanged. This Addendum Is Intended to Clarify the Following Terms: 1. Section 1.00, Subsection 4 on Page 3 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Evaluation Factors: Proposers Responding to This Request Will Be Evaluated on Several Factors as Set Forth in the Rfp, Including but Not Limited to Qualifications, Prior Experience, Proposed Cost Control Approach, and Overall Project Approach for the Complete Work. 2. Section 9.00, Subsection 2 on Page 16 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Documents Required: Proposal Packages Must Include the Following: o Response Documents and All Requested Additional Related Items Including but Not Limited to Resumes, Etc. o Statement of Prequalification (Attached as Exhibit a) o Statement of Assurance (Attached as Exhibit B) 3. Section 4.00, Subsections 4 and 5 on Page 9 of the Rfp Are Deleted and Replaced With the Following: Payment of Overtime: Proposer Shall Pay Proposer's Employees Who Work Under the Public Contract at Least Time and a Half for All Overtime the Employees Work in Excess of 40 Hours in Any One Week, Except for Employees Under a Personal Services Public Contract Who Are Excluded Under Ors 653.010 to 653.261 or Under 29 U.s.c. 201 to 209 From Receiving Overtime. 4. Section 6.00, Subsection 2.1 on Page 12 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Questions Regarding the Information Contained in the Rfp Must Be Submitted to the Rfp Contact No Later Than 3:30 Pm Pst, June 17, 2022. All Questions Must Be Received by the Specified Date and Time. E-mail Questions to the Addresses Below. o for Questions Regarding the Rfp Process: Bob Archer, Dallas School District Bob.archer@dsd2.org 5. Section 9.00, Subsection 1 on Page 16 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Response Format: the Responses Shall Be Organized in the Manner and Shall Be Presented in the Same Sequence as Indicated Below. Any Deviation From the Format May Result in the Evaluation Committee Being Unable to Locate Specific Information Which May Result in a Loss of Points. Proposals Shall Be Limited to Twenty (20) Pages Total (or the Electronic Equivalent), Including All Exhibits and/or Attachments. 11x17 Sheets and Fold-outs May Be Used Where Appropriate; However, in No Event Shall a Submission Exceed Twenty Pages Total. Page Size Will Not Affect Scoring of Submissions. All Pages Shall Be Numbered. The Following Pages Are Exempt From the 20 Page Limit: Cover and Back of Submittals, a One Page Cover Letter, a One Page Table of Contents, Resumes Requested in This Proposal, and Tab and Blank Divider Pages. The Proposals Shall Be Tabulated in Separate Sections in Response to the Detailed Proposal Requirements. No Other Material Shall Be Submitted. The Proposal Must Be Signed by an Officer of the Proposer With the Authority to Commit the Firm. 6. Section 10.00, Subsection 4.3 on Page 18 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Additional Team Members: for Those Individuals That Are Not Full Time as Listed in the Preceding Subsection 4.2, Describe How They Will Work on the Project. If Your Proposal Involves Individuals From More Than One Firm, Describe Prior Experience, if Any, of the Firms and Individuals Work With Each Other, and How the Proposed Team Will Work for This Project. By Listing the Individuals in the Proposal, the Firm Assures That These Individuals Will Work on the Project at an Approximate Minimum of the Percentages Shown. The Owner Reserves the Right to Request a Substitution of Personnel if Deemed to Be in the Best Interest of the Owner. Should the Firm Be Invited to an Interview, the Key Personnel Listed Above Will Need to Be in Attendance and Questions May Be Directed Solely to Them. At a Minimum, the Program/project Executive, Program Manager, and Project Manager (or the Approximate Equivalents of Those Positions) Dedicated to the Project Shall Be in Attendance at Any Interview. 7. Section 10.00, Subsection 2.1 on Page 17 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Firm Description: Provide a Brief Description of Your Firm and Its Capabilities. Include Annual Project Volume Figures for the Past Five Years. If a Joint Venture, Provide the Information for Each of the Firms Involved. 8. Section 10.00, Subsection 2.3 on Page 17 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Specific Facility Experience: Describe Specific Experience, and Provide a Listed as Indicated Above, of Your Firm's Experience in the Following Types of Facilities, Including All Information Indicated Above to the Extent Such Information Is Not Already Provided in Subsection 2.2 Above: o Public Agencies and Public Contracting: Describe Your Firm's Experience on Projects for Public Agencies and Performed Under Public Contracting Statutes and Requirements. o Remodeling: Describe Your Firm's Experience on Projects Where Interior and Exterior Remodeling Was Done to Existing Timber and/or Wood Framed Structures. 9. Section 8.00 on Page 15 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: Proposals Will Be Evaluated on the Basis of the Following Areas and Points Assigned: Evaluation Criteria Maximum Possible Points Cover Letter 0 Points Firm Experience 15 Points Construction Project Management Related Experience 20 Points Key Personnel Experience 20 Points Overall Project Understanding/approach 20 Points Scheduling Approach 5 Points Cost Control 5 Points References 5 Points Maximum Possible Points 100 Points 10. Section 2.00, Subsection 3.2 on Page 5 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: the Right to Accept or Reject Any or All Responses to This Request for Proposal, and to Waive Any Informalities and/or Irregularities in Such Proposals. The District May Also Reject for Good Cause All Proposals After Finding That Doing So Is in the Public Interest. 11. Section 2.00 on Pages 3-4 of the Rfp Is Amended as Follows: the Project Consists of Two Phases ("Phase One" and "Phase Two"). Phase One Is the Pre-construction Phase and Includes Prioritizing Projects Using the Long Range Facility Planning Study for the Maintenance, Repair and Installation of Improvements to Dallas School District Property. The Current Scope of the Project, and the Specific Projects Therein, Have Not Yet Been Finalized by the District. Thus, the Project Manager Will Assist the District to Identify Which Projects Should Be Prioritized Given an Estimated Construction Budget Resulting From the May 17 Bond Measure Approval by the Dallas School District Voters, and Assist the District in Establishing Construction Schedules for Said Projects. The Project Manager Will Also Assist the District in Determination of Priority of Projects Based on Safety and Security Concerns Within the Anticipated Bond Budget. Anticipated Projects Include: - Creating Space for Vocational/career Technical Programs - Providing Upgrades Including Roof Replacements, Siding, and District-wide Re-piping - Improving Building/campus Safety - Creating Secure Entries at Each Building to Control Access - Creating Instructional Space to Improve Student Learning and Support Specialized Programs - Modernize Schools, Including Hvac Systems and Control Upgrades to Improve Air Quality - District-wide Technology Infrastructure Upgrades to Create Equitable Access by Students - Construct a New Gym at the Middle School to House Physical Education and Free Up Space to Enhance the Special Service Needs Within the Building. Phase Two of the Project Is the Construction Phase. The Project Manager Will Represent and Assist the District With Specific Projects, Which May Include, but Is Not Limited to, Reviewing and Making Recommendations to the District Regarding General and Overall Planning, Design, Administration, Budget, Oversight, Public Communication, Quality Assurance/quality Maintenance Services and Any Other Services Typically Provided by an Project Manager. The Project Manager Will Work With the District Administrative Team in Administering the Budget and Process for Both the Pre-construction and Construction Portions of the Project. Services Provided May Also Include Projects That Have Not Yet Been Identified but Will Be Similar in Scope to the Current Projects Listed in This Proposal. The Project Manager Must Also Perform Work in the Scope of Services Set Forth in the General Conditions ("Project"). The Total Project Budget Shall Be the Amount of Bond Funds Approved by the Voters, and Eligible State Grant Funding Received by the District. Additional Requirements: by Submitting a Proposal, the Proposer Certifies That the Proposer Has Not Discriminated Against Minority, Women or Emerging Small Business Enterprises in Obtaining Any Required Subcontracts. Pursuant to Oar 580-061-0040, Proposers Are Hereby Notified That Policies Applicable to Consultants and Contractors Have Been Adopted That Prohibit Sexual Harassment and That Proposers and Their Employees Are Required to Adhere to the District's Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment in Their Interactions. By Submission of Your Proposal, the Signatory (a Duly Authorized Representative of the Submitting Firm) Must Certify That the Firm Is Not, to the Best of Their Knowledge, in Violation of Any Oregon Tax Law. For Purpose of This Certification, "Oregon Tax Laws" Means a State Tax Imposed by Ors 320.005 to 320.150 and 403.200 to 403.250, Ors Chapters 118, 314, 316, 317, 318, 321 and 323; the Elderly Rental Assistance Program Under Ors 310.630 to 310.706; and Local Taxes Administered by the Oregon Department of Revenue Under Ors 305.620. Soderstrom Architects ("Architect") Who Utilized a Long Range Facility Planning Study to Prioritize Projects for the Maintenance, Repair, Building, Remodeling, and Installation of Improvements to Dallas School District Property With an Eye on Equity So That All Stakeholders Are Considered. The District Now Wishes to Hire a Construction Project Manager to Serve as the District's Representative in Coordinating and Managing the Implementation of the Identified Projects Between the Architect and the Contractor to Ensure the District's Interests Are Being Met The method of Contractor Selection has not been Determined at this time.